The criminally controlled American Bar Association

justice-handcuffs-e1372182679824-300x286

 

“In the late 17th and early 18th centuries, after English kings reasserted direct political authority over the colonies, England’s common law system–complete with courts, juries and lawyers–crossed the ocean. Even so, most citizens did not rely on lawyers for legal information. Historian Eldon Revere James found that between 1687 and 1788, not a single legal treatise intended for lawyers was published in America. During that period, all the legal treatises were for laymen.”[1]

353px-JackThompsonAttorney_crop
John Bruce “Jack” Thompson

John Bruce “Jack” Thompson was disbarred in Coral Gables, Florida in 2008 for challenging the criminal control by the American Bar Association on knowledge of the law in the USA.

“He is also known for his unusual filings to the Florida Bar, including challenging the constitutionality of the Florida Bar itself in 1993.[5] Later the Florida Supreme Court described his filings as “repetitive, frivolous and insulting to the integrity of the court”.[6] On March 20, 2008, the Florida Supreme Court imposed sanctions on Thompson, requiring that any of his future filings in the court be signed by a member of the Florida Bar other than himself.[7] In July 2008, Thompson was permanently disbarred by the Supreme Court of Florida for inappropriate conduct, including making false statements to tribunals and disparaging and humiliating litigants.[2]

Mr. Thompson was permanently disbarred because he would not play ball with the good-ol’-boys club.  Most lawyers are not permanently disbarred, even when they serve prison sentences!  Any lawyer who does not rat out the good-ol-boy club can be reinstated after five years, regardless of the crimes they have been convicted of and have serve prison sentences for.  But if you don’t play ball, then you are permanently disbarred.

The American Bar Association is
clearly a criminal organization
with no independent oversight.

Lawyers frequently sell out their clients for a fast buck.  I know this for a fact because I spent most of my life as legal support staff.  I still can’t stand the vultures, so I mostly worked temporary.  This allowed me to go around the block many times and observe the crimes of many lawyers against their own clients.  I spent years watching them literally screw their clients because they don’t really have a license to practice law.

The vast majority of American lawyers have a license to practice billing.

teresa9f-1-web

“Real Housewives of New Jersey” star Teresa Giudice is suing her former attorney for $5 million, claiming he is the reason she’s going to jail for 15 months starting in January.”[3]

Guidice went to prison because of her lawyer’s crime and her husband is being deported.  The criminal activity was the lawyer’s, not the clients’, and the court knew this, but they put the defrauded clients in prison, primarily because the courts of equity were dissolved in the 1980s, which eliminates justice altogether, relying mostly on unconstitutional laws that now cannot be challenged as a matter of equity by a court of equity.

Equity is essential for justice to be had.

A Constitutional amendment banning lawyers from public office was first proposed in 1997 and I wholly support it.  Lawyers control the three branches of federal government and all state legislatures.  Being that most lawyers are only interested in a license to practice billing, they are whores easily purchased by the fascist multinational corporations.  Governor Greg Abbot of the State of Texas is a rare exception.  He is one of the few golden needles in a haystack of vultures that I can still count on one hand.

“Criminal law has become more of an auction block than a system of justice.

  • Prosecutors routinely charge an accused felon with the harshest charges remotely possible. The object is to coerce the defendant into pleading guilty (for a lesser penalty) rather than forcing the state into proving its case in open in front of a jury (an expensive process).
  • When the State charges someone with really heavy charges and then bargains down with the defendant that’s clearly wrong. If a person has in fact done really heavy stuff, then he should have to answer for it, all of it. Either the State can prove its case in its entirety or it shouldn’t bring it.
  • RICO is a prime example that is clearly malevolently misused by prosecutors to coerce behavior. Bad Law for good reasons.
  • Defense attorneys do the same thing on a different front. They have the defendant routinely plead Not Guilty regardless of whether or not he did the deed or not. The reasoning here is to delay the process for as long as possible in the hopes of wearing down the prosecution to get a better deal for the client.
  • Witnesses die, move, disappear. Evidence gets lost. Memories fade. Other things get more important for the state to pursue.” [4]

State bars require lawyers to take
15 hours of classes every year to study ethics.
Ethics cannot be taught.  Either you have them or you don’t.
Most lawyers clearly have no ethics.

That’s why we have people like Ted Cruz running for President when he knows damned well on the front end that he does not qualify as a candidate.  He does not care that he is violating the Constitution!  That in itself is evidence of his lack of loyalty.  This lack of loyalty to the Constitution is shared by 99% of the lawyers in this nation.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. U.S. Const., Art ii, clause 5.

But, Ted Cruz, like virtually all lawyers, assumes anyone who is not a lawyer is stupid. And lawyers dare not go against the legal machine or they will end up fraudulently disbarred like Jack Thompson was for pushing the envelope against corruption in the court system.  Or they end up illegally fined and blacklisted like Van Irion of Tennessee who challenged the corrupt misuse of the Commerce Clause in his Obamacare class-action lawsuit.

VanIrion
Van Irion

Or they end up totally out of business like Oklahoma lawyer Jeff Dickstein who took the fraudulent 16th Amendment to the Supreme Court and lost because the Supreme Court refused to consider the authenticated irrefutable evidence in violation of due-process of law.[5]

Jeff Dickstein
Jeff Dickstein

Because of the ignorance imposed on the American public who can easily be taught legal research and writing in a high-school honors course, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal get to illegally run for President while the American public swims in a confusion of lies.  We swim in a confusion of lies, not because we cannot read the law for ourselves, but because the law is intentionally being kept from the American public.  I am living proof of that.  I took one course in legal research and writing.  That one course made it possible for me to read any laws I want and I can be sure that I have every piece of law published on that topic and that it has not been overruled.  It’s really that easy.

Then when we get to reading the case law interpreting the statutory law, it becomes simple again.  When it is good law that supports and defends the Constitution, it is clear and easy reading.  When it is criminal corruption, even in Supreme Court opinions, then you will encounter gibberish designed to back into a predetermined biased opinion.

Those are the laws that need to be challenged.
Lawyers refuse to challenge those laws.
They are afraid of losing their license to practice billing.

One of the most treasonous opinions published by the U.S. Supreme Court is Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemical Corp, 401 U.S. 493 (1971), which is blatant subversion that spits in the face of every American. They had the audacity to essentially say “fuck the Constitution” as they informed the public that they will sit in their original jurisdiction, as required by the Constitution, if and when they feel like it.  It just doesn’t get more criminal than that.

Read: THE TREASONOUS TRASH ON THE 1971 SUPREME COURT

Therefore we, the people, must develop the courage to engage in pro se litigation.  We can and must do it ourselves.  I’ve done it and so can you, or you and your neighbors and friends.  I won an appeal for my landlord after we agreed in writing that I am not a lawyer, I can’t promise we will win (and neither can a lawyer), and that it is imperative that I am paid zero so I do not go to prison for the alleged felony of practicing law without a license.  I coached him and his interpreter daughter how to defend the legal documents I prepared and filed for them.  It is that law that is the crime and not helping a friend get justice, as was regularly done in American law until the Civil War.

Therefore, when Governor Greg Abbott of Texas does convene the Constitutional Convention in the near future, I highly recommend that he consider this constitutional amendment to ban lawyers from public office.  Being the ethical person that he has proven himself to be, I believe he will see the wisdom in such an amendment.  He is every bit as aware as I am that most lawyers are criminals.

Criminal-lawyers-are-redundant

♠♦♣♥

[1] http://caught.net/prose/everyam.htm

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(activist)

[3] “Real Housewives of New Jersey” star Teresa Giudice is suing her former attorney for $5 million, claiming he is the reason she’s going to jail for 15 months starting in January.

[4] http://www.spectacle.org/797/gosta.html

[5] See https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-gospel-according-to-jane/we-the-people-of-the-united-states-in-order-to-form-a-more-perfect-union/163488257321 for more details.

Advertisements