Do minorities have rights superior to majorities?


Democracy is defined as:

Government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them either directly or through their elected agents;… a state of society characterized by nominal equality of rights and privileges.[1]

The word “nominal” has seminal significance in this definition.

Simple Definition of nominal[2]

  • :existing as something in name only : not actual or real
  • :very small in amount

Minorities have equal rights
in proportion to their minority.

To allow minorities to rule majorities is manifesting itself today in total perversion of the social morays and rights of the moral majority.  Minorities say they have “equal” rights.  Let’s look at what equal really means:

Simple Definition of equal[3]

  • :the same in number, amount, degree, rank, or quality
  • :having the same mathematical value
  • :not changing : the same for each person

Equality means the right is “the same for each person.”  That means all people and not just the aggrieved person.

Equal rights means
no person’s rights
are abrogated.

Let’s consider “equal rights” in terms of two very hot button topics:  the rights of perverts (homosexuals and those confused about their gender, pedophiles, rapists, etcetera) is one.  The right of Muslims to turn whatever country they live in into an Islamic caliphate is the other.

download (2)

The rights of Perverts versus the Rights of the non-Perverted

I’m sure some are ready to scream, there is no such thing as a pervert!  No, the term pervert is not a slur.  The term pervert does not speak of bigotry.  This is the real meaning of the word “pervert”:

Simple Definition of pervert[4]

  • :to change (something good) so that it is no longer what it was or should be
  • :to cause (a person or a person’s mind) to become immoral or not normal

I did not make this definition up.  This is the accepted understanding of what the word “pervert” means.  As a verb or a noun, it still means the same.

A pervert is no longer the way it was created.
By definition, a pervert is immoral or not normal.

This is the fact that perverts do not want to understand.  So in true perverted form, they seek out the insane, better known as leftists, Communists, and Hillary Clinton, to pervert the laws for them so that their immoral or not normal behavior has superior right to the behaviors of normal people.

I can understand perverts wanting separate bathrooms because they don’t feel safe in heterosexual bathrooms when using one assigned to the sexual gender that they can double check on inside their pants.  What is offensive is what perverts are achieving right now, which is making their right to safety superior to the safety rights of the moral majority.

While we cater to the sensibilities of perverts,
heterosexuals are raped in public restrooms by perverts.
Why is the right of perverts to safety superior to that of heterosexuals?

Perverts’ rights are not superior.  Their rights are “nominal”, which also means their rights are not “equal” either.  Perverts compose less than 1% of the population.  Therefore, normal people also have a right superior to the right of perverts to safety; the superior right is that of the 99% majority to have safety in public restrooms too.  Target stores on it’s deathbed is proof of that.

Creating three types of public restrooms
is not a matter of personal preference.
It’s a matter of public safety.

Refusal by perverts to use a separate facility is demanding the right to violate heterosexuals.  No pervert has anymore right to violate heterosexuals than a heterosexual has a right to violate perverts.  That’s what equal rights is about; coming to a common ground, not forcing the will of one upon the other.

We will have equal rights when
perverts respect the rights of heterosexuals.

* * *


The rights of Muslims to propagate their theocracy

Simple Definition of religion

  • :the belief in a god or in a group of gods
  • :an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods
  • :an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group

It is a mistake to call Islam a religion or even simply a political ideology.  Islam has proven itself around the world to be a “theocracy”:

Simple Definition of theocracy

  • :a form of government in which a country is ruled by religious leaders
  • :a country that is ruled by religious leaders

If Islam were a “religion,” it would not use deadly force to convert people.  Everywhere Islam is the majority religion, you find the government is ruled by Muslim religious leaders called imams.

In the United States, Islam is illegal because it’s stated mission
is to overthrow all other forms of government, which is a
“seditious conspiracy” punishable by prison or death. 18 USC 2384.

So there is no “discrimination” when opposing the Islamic invasion of Obama’s real army into the USA because what we are opposing is the Muslim in the White House overthrowing the United States Constitution.  After he’s out of office, Hillary Clinton plans to continue that invasion.  Donald Trump currently claims he opposes it, but we have to wait for time to tell the truth, because this man clearly shows no respect for the Constitution either.

Do minorities have rights
superior to majorities?

No, they do not.  And neither to majorities have rights superior to minorities.  Equality of rights is a nominal thing; it’s not actual or real, or it is in a very small amount.  Equality means respecting the rights of all the same.  We can respect the rights of perverts to be and we can respect the rights of Muslims to be.  But no minority has the right to shove their preferences down the throats of those who do not agree.