If someone came to a doctor and asked him to cut off a perfectly healthy arm because it just felt “wrong” for the arm to be there, should the doctor do it? This isn’t an idle question because this does happen with a mental illness called Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID). People who have it feel as if they’re not supposed to have a certain body part, like an arm or leg. As a general rule, doctors won’t remove a healthy body part; so some of these poor deluded people crush, mangle, burn, or otherwise deliberately destroy their own arms or legs in order to get a surgeon to slice them off.
This raises a question: Are surgeons who refuse to remove healthy limbs from people with BIID doing them a service because they’re mentally ill or are they denying them their civil rights?
Why is it that our government/media/mind controllers (aka globalist owned and operated CIA) want to force heterosexuals to swallow the illusion that if a man surgically has his penis inverted that he is a “real woman,” regardless of the fact that he has no ovaries and cannot reproduce?
The gibberish that the mind controllers use to create this illusion, which has no basis in fact and is based purely on intellectual hypotheses, is found in Wikipedia under the category of “Sex and gender distinction,” as if sex and gender are not one and the same:
The distinction between sex and gender differentiates sex (the anatomy of an individual’s reproductive system, and secondary sex characteristics) from gender, which can refer to either social roles based on the sex of the person (gender role) or personal identification of one’s own gender based on an internal awareness (gender identity). In some circumstances, an individual’s assigned sex and gender do not align, and the person may be transgender, non-binary, or gender-nonconforming.
The sex and gender distinction is not universal. In ordinary speech, sex and gender are often used interchangeably. Some dictionaries and academic disciplines give them different definitions while others do not.
Wow! So in “ordinary speech,” sex and gender” are interchangeable. Therefore, the assignment of a “sex and gender distinction” is fictitious in order to create the illusion.
The words “pants” and “trousers” are interchangeable
because there is no difference.
But in the 19th Century, the illusion existed
that “pants” was a “dirty” word.
So let’s look at what the dictionary has to say about the distinction between “sex” and “gender”:
Definition of sex
:the state of being male or female
:men or male animals as a group or women or female animals as a group
:physical activity in which people touch each other’s bodies, kiss each other, etc. : physical activity that is related to and often includes sexual intercourse
Definition of gender
1a: a subclass within a grammatical class (as noun, pronoun, adjective, or verb) of a language that is partly arbitrary but also partly based on distinguishable characteristics (as shape, social rank, manner of existence, or sex) and that determines agreement with and selection of other words or grammatical forms.
Simple enough: Sex is whether you have a penis or vagina and gender is a subclass within a grammatical class “based on distinguishable characteristics,” such as “sex.”
The mind controllers created a false distinction between an identifying term, “sex,” and a word that constitutes a “grammatical subclass” that is based on the distinguishable characteristic of “sex.”
If “sex” is not the same thing as “gender”
then “pants” are not “trousers,”
“flesh” is not “meat,”
“white” is not “Caucasian,”
“black” is not “Negroid.”
The term “transgender” was created to facilitate the illusion that sex and gender are not synonymous. So then why it is necessary for the government/media/mind controllers to create this illusion?
The National Institute for Health study of endocrine disrupting chemicals reveals the reason why government/media/mind controllers find it necessary to create the illusion that sex is a matter of choice and not a matter of physical fact at birth:
Although scientists have postulated a wide range of adverse human health effects of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), the nexus of the debate is the concern that prenatal and childhood exposure to EDCs may be responsible for a variety of abnormalities in human sexuality, gender development and behaviors, reproductive capabilities, and sex ratios. Scientists today are asking hard questions about potential human effects: Do EDC exposures impair fertility in men or women? Can they cause sexual organ malformations, stunted reproductive development, or testicular or breast cancer? Do fetal exposures to EDCs alter sex phenotypes? Do they change later gender-related neurobiological characteristics and behaviors such as play activity and spatial ability? Could such exposures even be involved in the etiology of children born with ambiguous gender?
* * *
In many well-documented cases of high-level fetal exposures to known EDCs such as DES, certain PCBs, and DDT, the answer to the question of whether exposure is associated with gender-related effects is clearly yes. But high-level exposures such as these are relatively rare and isolated.
The last sentence is a blatant lie. Chemtrails are now no longer propagandized away as non-existent. The patented existence and use of chemtrails is now an open topic of discussion at the United Nations. Therefore, NIH blatantly lies when it claims that high-level exposures to endocrine disrupting toxic chemicals is rare and isolated, when it is now worldwide.
. . . certain kinds of chemicals can and do disrupt human [and other animals’] entire immune system. Going back 30 years, researchers were investigating what became known as endocrine [hormone] disrupting chemicals and how they were affecting frogs [who sometimes had five legs or hermaphroditic characteristics], other aquatic animals, and mammals. These animals were the proverbial canaries in the coal mine.
* * *
. . . these poisons acted synergistically; and 1+1 could equal up to 1,600 times the original dose. We are also exposed to more than 100,000 chemicals regularly. Most of them have never been tested for human safety. So, almost nothing has been done to reduce human exposure to a myriad of hazardous chemicals. In fact, over the past decade, the Bush administration dismantled many environmental laws in existence for 30 years, to let corporations off the proverbial hook.
* * *
What is not addressed in this increase in dementia is the more than 10 years of breathing Chemtrails with nano aluminum-coated fiberglass. Billions of tons have been sprayed on us.
CHEMTRAILS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WIDESPREAD
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM DISRUPTION,
WHICH CAUSES SEXUAL CONFUSION.
Hello? Would you please re-read the words in red and meditate on them? Hermaphrodites are a chemically induced perversion of nature. Hermaphrodites do not normally occur in nature. This perversion is intentionally being induced on a global basis. But why?
Disrupting endocrine hormones are the ultimate birth control.
Fostering the illusion of transgenderism and
forcing it on the 99% heterosexual population
guarantees division and strife that leads to civil war.
Legitimizing sexual perversion guarantees extinction of the specie. Creating friction between the perverted and the unperverted guarantees violence, which facilitates a more rapid extinction of the specie.
Sexual perversion is only a mental illness insofar as our entire world population is currently subjected to chemically induced physical and mental illness, with the exception of those with sufficient wealth to afford countering measures. This mental illness is being facilitated by the propaganda that is now mainstream media programming in its entirety.
Is there a solution to the chemically induced perversion of human sexuality?
Yes, it’s called taking down the mad dog. All national governments are now clearly in the hands of insane creatures that I cannot call human beings because their objective is clear: to eliminate the human race. Whether they are off-world or inter-dimensionally invading through demonic possession is another topic.
When you have the leftist faction in the United States that calls itself Democrats backing a lesbian who promotes perversion and espouses destruction of human rights as her objective, and when her primary opponent embraces the promotion of perversion and rape, which is completely opposite his alleged conservative platform, then what you have is a captive nation, because nothing is going to change for the better. They share the same agenda.
What does Donald Trump plan to do about chemtrails?
Most likely nothing. Why? Because they are fundamental to his agenda to facilitate the rape of heterosexual women and children in public restrooms. It is because of Trump’s position on public restroom safety that I no longer believe that he intends to reverse the jihadist invasion led by Barak Hussein Obama.
Trump is a fraud; as phony as a $3 bill.
If he can facilitate rape then he has no intention of stopping the American jihad.
Just like he never intended to finance his entire campaign,
to which the piker donated only a measly $250k.
So then, why would Infowars compromise their ethics to support Trump’s blatant, documented lies? Alex insinuated on his show recently (before I stopped watching) that he’s doing it because he will do “anything” to stop Hillary. Too bad Alex feels a need to stoop to Hillary’s level of deception, throwing away his high moral ground. Until Alex reverses his position of pedaling Trump’s lies, he’s just another media whore.
If Alex Jones is so hell bent on stumping for Trump, then as an objective journalist he should also broadcasts opinions that oppose his own, so that the undiscerning do not mistake Alex’ opinion for fact.
Go to Infowars for different propaganda.